KISS (Keep It Simple Stupid)

Long Live the Simple

Long Live the Simple

Nothing spreads faster and more effectively than stupidity, the simple, uncomplicated. Simple viruses and bacteria can devastate the complex human organism and whole communities, as can bullets and knives. No wonder that simplistic slogans wedded to simple destructive objects can sweep the country like the plague.

We Gladly Die for Thee!

We Gladly Die for Thee!

Nazi slogans like “Blood and Earth” could infect and devastate the minds and lives of still untold millions. So can slogans like “life begins at conception” tied to a single cell (“since I have the mind of a single cell, what is the difference between a fertilized egg and a human being?”) Or “get rid of government” tied to the right to dispense bullets.

To point out the simple-mindedness of such diseases is to miss the whole reason for their effectiveness. The simple, like the drunk, are under the spell of stupidity and proud of it, they are God’s children.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Of Mystical Surrogates and Prejudiced Communication

The sex-psychologist Christoph Joseph Ahlers, in a recent interview with “Zeit,” repeated the idea that sexual interaction is the most intimate form of communication and that communication is the most important function of sex.

It is all about the Plumbing

It is all about the Plumbing

Sounds lovely, but if we took this seriously, all kinds of fun problems might arise. For example, when the Catholic church insists that one only may have sex, even within a marriage, if one wants to procreate, this would mean that spouses should really only communicate intimately when they want to increase the number of Catholics. One reason, then, for the ruthless contribution to the overpopulation by some religious fundamentalists may be that even they like to sneak in a bit of intimate communication?

Not so, of course, because the majority of traditional sex performers still prefer lights out, throw rocks at each other (get your rocks off), “close your eyes and think of England,” I know what’s coming, hopefully soon, I have to show that I am a real man/a real woman, “was it as good for you as for me” (since we did not listen to each other), etc.

If we are good, we know how to do it. We are fully prepared. If we are not, we might get scared (again). Why do we need to come with an arsenal of knowledge to intimate contact, including the knowledge that it may be better to act as if we have been naive or ignorant, at least for a woman? A good argument can be made that much of preparing ourselves comes out of fear of the unknown, the sense that we couldn’t perform, get high ratings, if we did not come with a solid pack of experience, i.e. pre-judice.

Too Much Intimacy with God

Too Much Intimacy with God

It’s a bit like the instructions for prayer. You should be completely open to your God, open your heart, have a naked soul (not body, God can’t see through clothing, on the head or elsewhere, thank God), and listen like a child to what He has to say. In the meantime, let me, the priest, tell you what God is saying to you, has been saying to you, inflamed bush and all. Actually, it is better that you let me, the priest, serve as your communication partner with God. I am your surrogate god, thou shalt have no other surrogate beside me (except for procreation.) No wonder that in some (former) religions temple priestesses and temple prostitutes were indistinguishable. It’s a proud tradition, thousands of years old. So what is this recent uproar regarding too intimate communication between shepherds and their flock all about? If we are conservatives, we surely would respect history, or?

One of the deepest form of total body communication is of course the mystical ecstasy so often admired in the saints of all colors and cultures (and in Tantric sex). The troublesome aspect of such mystics is, however, that they claim that God has spoken to them directly, has said something new, broken through the prejudicial layers of volumes of tradition.  Such intimate communication is as unacceptable, except in retrospect (when the Saint has been killed), as intimate communication between two lovers who join under the sun in tender, open, completely unprejudiced communicative exploration.

What would happen to priests, educators, therapists, parents, and bad-mouthing peers, if such true closeness, innocent as on the day we were born, became what we actually yearned for? Inconceivable – because it would always leave behind all pre-established concepts, laws, morals, stereotypes, and all.

Intimate Whispers

Intimate Whispers

Perhaps the fear of such unprejudiced closeness between people is why we have so many laws against anything to do with physical love, while we promote violence as the most cherished form of ecstatic prejudice.

If the most intimate form of communication became more widespread, there is a plausible possibility that the truth might come out, here and there, under the covers, and that surely would not only be a threat to religious authority but also to national security. Unless of course, Presidents like George W. Bush or Barack Obama can pull a Joan of Arc on us and say that God has spoken to them. That’s better than sex (ask Mary).

 

Posted in Thoughts from the Fence | 2 Comments

Minor Scale

To be finely tuned and ever so predictably on time?
Let us all!

Is time only a tune clicking along too slowly
to sing a song with us?

Does in-tune so chain us into time
that it only mirrors the strictures of punctuality?
Oscillations per second
or dare we still the free song?

Clicks for rhythms
or the luscious swinging of hips
to soar above all meters and measures?

Was it accuracy that killed off our innocence?
German tanks flying over Cuckoo clock’s nests
and all the world sings their advertising jingle.
Even the birthplace of Dionysos is now destined
to tune into the robot age and pay homage on time.

Posted in Thoughts from the Fence | Leave a comment

Innocent Bystander

Afghan_girls_in_September_2012

On December 3rd, the Military Times reported that the “International Security Assistance Force” in Kabul announced that it may have “accidentally killed three innocent Afghan civilians,” for the sake of international security, of course. The three “individuals” hit were 12, 10 and 8 years old. They had been digging on a dirt road. Kill’em!

According to their family, they had been gathering dung, which their community uses as fuel. The military saw them from up high, said no-shit and splattered them. It is to be recommended that all children be prohibited from digging, even in sandboxes or at the beach (in case we want to try another heroic landing), since our robotic droning on and on about security might mistake them as a threat. Zero Tolerance, God damn it! And, we have to ask, who these days is really innocent?

Saint Christopher

Saint Christopher

George Orwell, in his famous article on Gandhi, opened with the lovely phrase “all saints should be assumed guilty until proven innocent.” His reasoning was that the agenda of saints is usually not of this world. One could easily apply this argument to children, as well. They really are not yet with the program and therefore can so easily be persuaded to  become stooges for all kinds of adult agendas. Good reason to kill them in Afghanistan, Gaza, Israel, Brazil or in the poor neighborhoods of the Secure Homeland.

All this is, of course, as it should be, we collateralizing adults know only too well. However, one odd question keeps popping up, still without any reasonable answer. Wars and poverty are usually imposed on the children in the name of God Almighty. All around the globe the children learn with their religious catechisms and memorize with their holy scriptures that their Lord God is all powerful, omnipresent, etc., etc. What puzzles them is why then the little body of their best friend can be torn apart, even if by collateral accidentals, in the name of this God, and he does not save them from this horrible fate. Even if, after dying of starvation or by bloody explosion, this little body is going to go straight to pure heaven, why, by the Name of the Almighty, could the child not have gone to heaven without such vicious experience?

Safe Heavens

Safe Heavens

In ethics and law, it is usually maintained that a bystander is not innocent if he or she could reasonably have been expected to save a victim from grievous harm. To see a man being pushed in front of a subway and not do anything to help raises at least some ethical eyebrows, as does not saving a toddler from drowning in shallow waters or shallow arguments, when one could simply reach down and save the child, without getting one’s loafers wet.

It appears, by all accounts, that God could save all of these children not only from being torn apart by the latest munitions but also from dying from the latest fluctuations in economic calculations or the latest versions of slowly wasting away with cancer, and all that without soiling His magnificent hands, just as the modern soldier can kill the children without getting anywhere near the spattering blood.

It is not a new insight that this God, who ever he or she may be imagined to be by the warring parties, is thus the ultimate not-innocent bystander. Since we are to follow in the footsteps of our gods, it therefore is also clear that we remain innocent like God if we do not help the innocent.

In God We Trust

In God We Trust

What remains amazing is that so many people keep praying to such gods who are so innocent that they do not even reach out to help a drowning child or the child molested and tortured by their Priest, Rabi, Imam, or Medicine Man. A colleague of mine had seen her two young children torn into bits and pieces of flesh, right in front of her, by a perfect bomb from heaven above. Her priest is still trying to bring her back into his flock, like a lost sheep. There is at least some logic in that.

But where is the logic of the adults around the dung-digging children who die, with terror in their eyes, for the glory of the god of their parents and liberators? Such gods, and not just their saints, should indeed be assumed guilty until proven innocent, if that were ever possible. And if we can’t come up with less guilty gods, should we not at least indite all adults who claim innocence in the name of such gods, as they kill children trained to gather shit, to keep them warm?

Posted in sketches | 5 Comments

Access

Phallic Symbol

Phallic Symbol

A German high court just ruled that the 1.4 million servants of the Lord in Germany may indeed go on strike, if the spirit moves them. How many legions are doing God’s work in America we can only guess, given that 80% of Americans are said to pledge allegiance to some religion; that probably requires a lot of service personnel.

Now, at the same time it has been announced that the Catholic Church just excommunicated one of their priests (with the oddly contradictory name of Roy Bourgeois) for having ordained women. You got to have that there thang between your legs to be of service.

Boss

Our Boss who art in Heaven

Even more exciting, the Church of England just ruled that women cannot become bishops, although here they can become priests. This is all the more intriguing as the head of the Church of England and of the bishops is a woman, the Queen (and no, this is not a slanderous word for one of the male bishops).

What all this can make us wonder is how we can have assured access to the deity. Obviously, the current servants of the Lord know that a woman will not have the same access to his Highness as a man. Yes, God is a sexist: get over it. But far worse is now on the agenda: all servants of the gods may refuse to grant us access by going on strike!

Sins

Sins

Since the Lord provides for his own and answers all their prayers, including winning elections, exactly who is the target of these strikes? When factory workers used to be allowed to strike, they were striking against the boss. When servants of God strike they therefore must not be satisfied by what He has given them, in answer to their prayers.

In the meantime, the lay persons have to do without.. without what?

No wonder America has opted for as much union-busting as possible! Not only do unions finance the wrong political party and advocate for equal rights for women, they may actually shut down religious wars like our most recent favorite, the holy bloodshed now blossoming in Gaza.

If all religious servants went on strike, would there be eternal peace?

On Strike

On Strike

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

“Killing me softly, with your words…”

Raptor or Rapture?

Raptor or Rapture?

An average of 40 pages of lusty words the General is supposed to have written to his one (and only?) non-mistress, amounting to a solid body of work of 30,000 pages. Such love for lust! And that when he should have been killing people, lots of people. Victory over those who know how to say “over my dead body!” not caresses for the very much alive body of the seductress.

The wonderful news is that, for heads of supreme killer armies and secret services, the luscious secrets of tantalizing affairs hold more interest than the stupid dispensing of bullets. Missives for sperms over ejaculating missiles. Why are we not applauding, rejoicing, call for encores, reading with envy?

Operation Enduring Freedom from Hypocrisy

Operation Enduring Freedom from Hypocrisy

A commentary in today’s German “Spiegel” observes that, from the European perspective, all this American hero-worship and focus on what one is forbidden to enjoy seems strangely out of touch. Is it really? Have we not always enjoyed comedies that have a buffoon strutting his manliness and self-righteousness across the stage, especially in theaters of war, while falling for wiles of a delicious maiden?

Whispers

Whispers

 

Is it a “dawns early light” of comedy replacing moral atrocities that we are now, finally, witnessing? To fully appreciate a devastatingly silly character, we first have to make him or her plausible. Done! We can now visualize top brass bent over their chart tables, ignoring the threats from the women-oppressing Taliban, and celebrating a woman instead, lusting not for the stench of battle fields but the seductive perfumes of bedroom victories.

All that remains to be accomplished is to teach the Taliban this American way! Follow us, as we follow in the footsteps of Jefferson and his mistress (and never mind Eisenhower or Kennedy).

Old Comforter

Old Comforter

The truth shall set you free to write risqué emails and dream of extending a hand across the aisle, even before you have finished walking down one. Now that takes the courage of Generals, to say nothing of their guiding light, the courage of free American women.

All this excitement over so little? It is not what happened but what could happen that is so exciting. Can we soon say: they gave a war and all the generals were in bed with their mistresses, all over the globe! (What a threat to the economy that would be! And the environment would only have to absorb a bit more heavy breathing.)

Posted in Leadership | 5 Comments

Pleasure: The Target of All Organized Evil

The apple was good. What the god did was evil. And therein lies the difference of good and evil.

Try to think of an organized religion that does not gain its strength by sucking on the blood of human pleasure while inflicting maximum pain and undermining human dignity.

We cannot be ethical without taking pleasure in each other. How else can we cherish and respect each other? To be ethical surely implies that we are in close touch with the music of each person’s thriving and potential for more beauty.

We cannot love if we do not want to give and receive pleasure, if we do not give with pleasure and delight in the pleasure of the giver when we receive.

Those who are parasites of the life force of others, by making them suffer for what they want to enjoy, commit slow torture unto death.

A favorite Texas two-step of the gods is to forbid as ethereal god-the-father and then advertise as incarnate god-the-snake, just in case forbidding does not rouse enough interest.

We know that most wars and most suffering have been started for religious reasons. That is but an extension of enforcing suffering on those who want sun on their body and joyous lust for their lover.

We will not become good if we insist that goodness consists in suffering and inflicting suffering. “Thou shalt not” is the road to all evil, whether spoken by the gods or by acting  without mutual agreement.

Thus Latin, the Pope’s language, uses “malus” to stand not only for “bad, evil” but also for “apple,” if only because one of the latter is so good that it can keep doctors and moralists away.

The religious hatred of those in the West who, with a cheap video, now are fueling religious hatred and violence in the Middle East is only one more chapter in the long history of the suppression of loving pleasure and freedom of body and mind turned to forces of destruction. It is only a quaint side-note to this endless intolerance of the love of life that one of these intolerant religious leaders, the Pope, now went to this troubled region to preach “tolerance,” by which he of course did not mean tolerance toward enjoying simple sexual pleasures, together, or the beauty of the naked human body.

Posted in Ethics | 3 Comments

Quaint

Schiller, in his famous Ode to Joy, declared that joy is the divine spark in all of us. Beethoven centered his last great work, the 9th Symphony, on this theme. Yet there is, at present, not a single entrance in the English Wikipedia under “joy.” It’s become a somewhat quaint concept, at the same time at which beauty has become largely siliconized.

Do the current presidential elections have any room for beauty and joy? Well, yes, in the sense of the German “Schadenfreude” – malicious joy in slandering, maligning, and foreseeing the defeat of other Americans, and then the world.

What if we tried to rebuild a sense of joy, creating moments of submerging our whole being in beauty, to be truly born again, not by polluting clear waters with our dogmatized sins, but by contributing the only worthy gift back to our universe, beauty and childlike joy in beauty, this moment, not in the past nor planned for a better future, but now? It is an old idea, offered by the wise from many cultures and historic periods. Why is it so difficult to retain beauty and joy in our daily lives? Why do we prefer the ugly and the nasty, the lies of the hard sell, the desperate pleading for a chance to corrupt whatever beauty there may be?

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

Zero Interest

According to a report by Spiegel magazine, strip bar owners in Tampa expect lucrative business during the Republican convention, this coming week. One wily stripper even held a press conference because her act consists in stripping as a Sara Palin double, who, the stripper points out, also liked to wear rather suggestive clothing, to focus public attention on her preferred assets.

One bar owner elaborated that Republicans spend much more money on strip bars, including tipping three times as much as Democrats (some of whom obviously need their pound of flesh, as well). One might of course wonder, why such staunch exploiters of religious dogmas would want to view women in their god-given attire. It obviously is not because they regard covering up God’s beautiful creation with human garments as a sin, which it clearly must be, from God’s point of view.

It may well be that some of these so-called conservatives are so bored by their own lifestyle that they have to get aroused by the very same titillations which they try so strenuously to forbid, against all reason.

However, a more likely explanation is that for them, as good capitalists, everything is for sale, is only of value to the extent in which that value can be given a dollar sign. “Since everything is for sale, nothing has any value.” So they use churches to sell more cars and life insurance; they use nationalism as a way to sell more weapons; they use the trauma of unwanted pregnancy to collect more campaign contributions… Trusting only in the dollar sign, they have to remind themselves that they should advertise instead on each dollar bill “In God We Trust.”

Having cheapened everything beyond recovery, they try to regain some sense of direction by spending their ill-gotten money on cheapening the human body over and over again, to prove to each other that they are real men, after all, and therefore can be trusted to fight against the evils of human compassion.

As we drift more and more toward a society of listless hypocrites, the banking powers frantically try to stimulate us into new buying frenzies by charging practically no interest to the big boys, so that that they may get out of the strip joints and off the bully pulpits and start exploiting American workers again. The biggest success stories these days seem to come from innovators of advertising, from Google to much of the computer industry and the tax experts, who can show ever new ways of extracting revenue from people who otherwise would not know what to spend their dollars on.

Our world is so numbed by all the hype about what we should be interested in, including what should be forbidden, so as to make it all the more interesting, that the greatest exploiters of “I know the value of a dollar and nothing else” have to return to dingy places  in which a semblance of a mother’s breast is for sale, to get back to basics, perhaps.

The silliness of it all can make one laugh. It is the ruthless propagation of their species of shallowness that is chilling.

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Posh Ethics

One strives to be bettah… Surely, rising to the cream of the riding crop also entails, at least at the level of the horse’s arse, that one has acquired an expensive taste in ethics, paid for with the sweat of the rubble.

Cold Mirage

Cold Mirage

“Ethics is for and about persons.” That much I am sure of in my dreams and nightmares. Kant said so: “we all are, above suspicion.” Sad story is that persons are all around, but that it is difficult to catch any, at least in public, where most of them are, even or especially when alone… Is it a private matter, like going to the toilet?

They appear, seem to, with a smile, perhaps promising person, and then they vanish, leaving tarnish.

"you shall know them by their finery"

"you shall know them by their finery"

What would it take to presume persons innocent – innocent of being non-persons, mere things after all, since that is what they use ostentatiously as a disguise… or was it as their moment of reality?

Good manners do of course forbid to go on and on, moaning about this, whatever it is… We aspire to drift in and out, like a humming bird in glistening plumage, or as the bee known for its sting. Surely, this is not worth talking about, at our brief annual celebrations every week…

What happens when we exert ourselves, having accomplished the right to privacy, to fulfill the promise of that right? Do we actually have something to fill that space, something worth protecting so fiercely that we have built a whole codex of armor around it?

Yes, I want to respect you as a person, but, whatever you are, “where art thou,” when you are no longer in public where person non grata est? And if privacy only means hiding your curlers and undergarments, what am I respecting when I try to not bond, for reasons of ethics?

best left unspoken

best left unspoken

Again, lamenting absence is distasteful, breeding forbids talking about breeding of persons…, of animals, yes, of course, etc., etc…. So ethics? What’s the point, except for the lower classes, of course, to keep them from emerging as persons. Can’t bloody force them, of course, and seducing them should be left to hired hands, such as advertisers, preachers, and car salesmen. One does what one does. It is even unthinkable, in company, to have to say “let’s not get personal.”

Posted in Thoughts from the Fence | 2 Comments

Houses of Gossip

“And do you know what He said then…?”

I have heard it said that people on Wall Street are ten times more likely to tell ruthless lies than the general population. According to these reports, 11% percent of them are liars, while only 1 percent of the general population has such tendencies. I was incensed, of course, but not at what goes on at Wall Street but by the assertion that only 1% of the general population are supposed to exhibit such successful strategies.

The problem may be that we do not count gossip among lies. According to the current German Wikipedia, the German form of “Gossip” (“Klatsch”), as well the fear of gossip, are the foundation for social control in a community. Strong words!

But then the article goes on to say that gossip is regarded socially as a vice. Now there is food for thought (or more gossip). Gossip of course takes place in the absence of the talked-about person and tends to thrive on insinuations that are difficult to repudiate. What a wonderful characterization of religious talk! (“Did you know that God fathered a child in the virgin Mary (after she already had children), without having sex with her (He sent his Angel instead)?” –  ”(“Did you hear that the Greek God Zeus fathered a child with Europe and has been in debt at home ever since?”).)

Sundays at Wall Street

Sundays at Wall Street

So, since we love the art of gossip so much we have erected not only  stock exchanges like Wall Street in its honor, we have built an infinite number of tall-tale temples, churches, synagogues, etc., in its honor and established huge bureaucracies of high priests to regulate who can gossip about what, at the pain of excommunication or even death.

And what can the gods say in their defense? As Dostoyevsky says about Jesus (in the “Grand Inquisitor”): he remained silent.

Posted in Ethics | 2 Comments

Against

fulfillment from long knives

fulfillment from long knives

There is a rumor that some members of our political system are against everything, therefore they must also be against America. When any sense of justice, weighing what is fair and sustainable, on one hand, and what is blind greed, exploitation, and nearly suicidal addiction to quick profits, on the other, is no longer debated, one can wonder if another kind of energy is at work in sickened psyches.

Reading about current government initiatives to support American industrial output, I was wondering this morning if those who are against “government” (except government by anti-government vigilantes), would also be against helping American manufacturing. If past records are any indication, the answer would have to be yes, of course. It isn’t any longer a question of supporting government or industry, it is about organizing objections to all organized activity. A free-for-all is supposedly the answer, an answer shouted by highly subsidized mass movements against subsidizing anything but itself.

Now, one could still dream that a reasonable dialogue with the shepherds or sheep of these descendants of brownshirt-slogans could uncover the merits, or lack thereof, of being a pro at con, but such dreams miss the whole point.

The Againsters are not really against government or industry or the rule of the people, by the people, for the people: they are simply against. The human race appears to be balancing a sense of identity derived from what it is against and what it is for. Among Americans, at present, about half of the population seems to feel the more certain who they are, the more they can shout about what they are against.  The other half appears to be divided between those who know themselves because of what they are for and those who are content to have no clue about their sense of self (the latter often ready material for the Againsters).

Another Government Agency to Be Locked up...

Another Government Agency to Be Locked up...

The fact is that those who are addicted to a sense of self based on Againstism will feel personally attacked if one tries to change their mind to a more positive attitude. Imagine, for example, what all those people on the radical Against side would do if suddenly there were as little government as they are demanding now. What would they yell next? What would they want to be known by?

Againstism, as in “Tea Party,” can identify itself by the very substance it would throw away, creating a storm at least in a tea cup, perhaps in order to promote coffee. Or is all of this a plot against both coffee drinkers and against tea drinkers (beer would seem a better drink, or sanctimoniousness by the gallon)?  It would suggest, none of the above: it is a completely spontaneous, carefully organized reawakening of the forces against all those who are for anything. There is no weighing of what is reasonable, what is good. There is only a weighing in on the deaf and dumb side of the Spirit-That-Always-Says-No, the side of the “devil”.

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments